My choice would be then Bresser Maksutov Cassegrain 152mm F/12.5 and Bresser Exos 2, but it is your choice of the setup and there is a tip for you: Just follow your instinct. I can't help you with mounts, but I think that they are practically the same, so I would choose Bresser Exos 2 because of budget.So my choice would be Bresser Maksutov Cassegrain 152mm F/12.5. But you should be aware: You won't be able to observe many deep-sky objects (DSOs). Because you want to observe planets and maybe craters, you should buy Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope.It is your choice, which telescopes to buy, but I can give you my opinion: But if you want to just dive into astrophotography, then buy refractor because a smaller aperture can be replaced with longer exposure time. If you want to pay a little more than for a Dobsonian and make a little bit of astrophotography, then you should buy a Newton telescope. If you want big magnification, as I can see you want, then buy Maksutov-Cassegrain because a long focal length is rolled into the tube through many lenses and mirrors. The best choice for a little money and big aperture is a Dobsonian because of his simple Alt-az mount. They have usually smaller aperture like reflector or Maksutov-Cassegrain for the same money. I cannot think of any better advice for someone like yourself than to stick your toe in the water for a few seconds before jumping in.Ī quick description of many variants of telescopes: Refractors are very hard to make, but they don't have central obstruction. It is a group that regularly broadcasts their observing sessions. I haven't used an eyepieces for serious viewing since. Have you seen what they are capable of doing? I viewed with eyepieces for fifty years before trying a Mallincam ten years ago. There is a lot to be seen with that telescope and you have barely scratched the surface. If it's bang for buck that motivated your question I think you would get the most if you just explore the capabilities of the 3 inch refractor for a while. To suggest a F/12.5 Maksutov will satisfy you would be the equivalent of telling someone to dive into the deep end of a swimming pool without knowing if that person can swim. I have viewed through many telescopes over the years and in doing so have met many people like yourself. Since the MC is cheaper and has a bigger aperture, will the APO have any advantages eg.contrast? Also, what are your thoughts on the mounts? I wish to know your experience with refractors and MCs, in general, or with these specific models. In addition to my 26 & 12 mm Plossl eyepieces I plan on getting a 50mm Erfle (Field Stop 40mm) and a 6mm Plossl.įor mount, I was contemplating between Bresser Exos 2 and iOptron CEM25P. The MC is about 60% of the price of the APO. Portability and fast setup time are also a consideration. I hope to see basic details on Jupiter, Saturn and Mars at high contrast and clarity and perhaps the disc of Neptune. I live in a high altitude region with Bortle 3 skies. It has been a wonderful experience seeing the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn magnified and Andromeda, M33, M81 and much more for the first time. I bought my first telescope, a 3-inch refractor a few weeks ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |